Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:59
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sarah Michelle Gellar Wants to 'Bring Back Everyone' in the New Buffy - Variety
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What symptoms did you notice before being diagnosed with cancer?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Is heroin really as good as people say it is?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Is it wise to SECRETLY expose a narcissist by telling others that he/she is a covert narcissist?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Will Miami’s latest effort at “culture change” work? - NBC Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Amazon Slashes AirPods 4 Prices Just Before Prime Day, Now Closer to $0 Than $200 - Gizmodo